in ,

Trump Begins Filling Courts With Conservative Judges

The nomination and subsequent confirmation of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court got all the headlines, but it was really only the first step in President Trump’s mission to make the judiciary great again. This week, Trump is expected to announce at least five nominees (possibly as many as ten) to federal appeals courts around the nation, and there’s no reason to doubt that his selections will be cut from the same conservative, constitutional cloth as Gorsuch.

In these relatively quiet proceedings, reluctant Trump voters – who may or may not be thrilled with the first few months of the billionaire’s presidency – are truly getting what they voted for. This is why, even when Republicans let us down, it’s so important to keep Democrats out of the White House.

According to people close to Trump’s inner circle, Trump is likely to nominate Joan Larsen and John Bush to the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, Davis Stras to the 8th Circuit, Amy Barrett to the 7th, and Kevin Newsom to the 11th. Two of those selections – Larsen and Stras – were on the president’s shortlist of Supreme Court nominees which he released during the campaign.

As noted by The New York Times, how one views Trump’s nominations will largely be dependent on one’s political ideology:

Jonathan H. Adler, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University, said the appeals court picks on Mr. Trump’s list included “incredibly strong nominees” who were within the judicial mainstream and should “have an intellectual influence on their courts.”

But liberal groups expressed alarm at the prospect of a federal bench filled with Mr. Trump’s appointees. “The Trump administration has made clear its intention to benefit from Republican obstructionism and to pack the federal courts with ultraconservatives given a stamp of approval by the Federalist Society,” said Nan Aron, the president of the Alliance for Justice, referring to the conservative legal group. “We’ll be scrutinizing the records of these nominees very carefully.”

Good, scrutinize away. But when you use terms like “ultraconservative” to describe judges who have maintained a commitment to using the Constitution as the ultimate guide, you’re not doing your little group any favors. In fact, you’re giving yourself away as someone who just wants a judiciary filled with liberals who make decisions based on the social trends of the day – particularly the most important trend, which is “The Resistance” to Trump.

What do you think?

0 points
Upvote Downvote

Total votes: 0

Upvotes: 0

Upvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Downvotes: 0

Downvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Written by Andrew

Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. Hmm it looks like your website ate my first comment (it was
    super long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I wrote and say, I’m thoroughly
    enjoying your blog. I as well am an aspiring blog writer but I’m still new to the whole thing.
    Do you have any tips for beginner blog writers? I’d certainly appreciate it.

  2. Hey! Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with us so I
    came to give it a look. I’m definitely enjoying the information. I’m bookmarking
    and will be tweeting this to my followers!

    Exceptional blog and terrific style and design.

  3. Hey very nice website!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Wonderful ..
    I’ll bookmark your website and take the feeds also?

    I’m satisfied to seek out numerous helpful information right here in the
    put up, we need work out more techniques in this regard, thank you for sharing.

    . . . . .

  4. I have been exploring for a little for any high quality articles or weblog posts in this
    sort of area . Exploring in Yahoo I finally stumbled upon this website.
    Studying this information So i am glad to show that I’ve a very just right uncanny feeling I came upon exactly what
    I needed. I most indubitably will make sure to do not fail to remember this web site and provides it a glance on a continuing basis.

  5. You really make it seem really easy along with your presentation however
    I find this topic to be really one thing that I think I’d never understand.
    It kind of feels too complicated and very vast for me.

    I am having a look forward to your next put up, I’ll try to get the dangle of
    it!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading…

Obama’s Wall St. Speeches Could Cost Him Presidential Pension

Questions Remain After Sally Yates’ Testimony