The New York Times took a typically myopic view of Facebook’s decision to ban Alex Jones and Infowars from its platform this week, refusing to even engage the thorny question of how much power we as Americans have afforded these giant tech companies. Instead, they sidestepped this crucial debate in favor of a simplistic, missing-the-point survey of First Amendment scholars, who all insist that Jones’s right to free speech has not been violated. The only problem, of course, is that no one was seriously making that claim to begin with.
But then the Times went further, claiming that even in such a case as the defamation suits that Jones is facing, he does not deserve First Amendment protection. In other words, freedom of speech is fine for people expressing a political point of view, but it isn’t okay for the owner of Infowars. This is apparently where we’ve landed on this debate, at least as far as leftist news outlets are concerned.
From the Times:
In a recent court filing, four law professors who specialize in free-speech issues said that Mr. Jones’s oeuvre was riddled with “absurd conspiracy theories” and urged a federal judge considering a lawsuit against him not to let him hide behind the First Amendment while publishing his rhetoric.
“False speech does not serve the public interest the way that true speech does,” the scholars wrote. “And indeed, there is no constitutional value in false statements of fact.”
…
While they acknowledged that the protection of speech is “a priority of the first order,” the First Amendment scholars, from institutions like Rutgers University and the University of Chicago Law School, noted that since the Middle Ages defamation law has created “social boundaries about what speech is and is not acceptable.” It has also, they wrote, long sought to balance the freedom of expression with the safeguarding of people’s reputations.
We’re not going to mount an argument that says Jones should be free to say whatever he wants, regardless of how it might damage an individual’s reputation and regardless of how much truth there is to his remarks. We agree with the scholars that there are limits to every Constitutional right, including the First Amendment. Defamation law is not exactly something the left just pulled out of their posteriors. It’s a thing, and Jones could in trouble in a number of current cases.
We just find it extraordinary that the Times would run this story this week, right after Facebook, Spotify, and Apple decided to “deplatform” Infowars from their sites. In doing so, they are making the implicit argument that not only is Jones (potentially) legally liable for defaming private individuals but that there is something just and right about these Silicon Valley billionaires picking and choosing who gets to spread their opinions on social media. THAT is something we will never agree with, especially given the flimsy reasons that Facebook cited when banning Jones from the site. Because if angry rhetoric against transgenders, illegal immigrants, and Muslims is not allowed in the public square, then Infowars will not be the last site banned.
Not by a long shot.
ivermectin 8 mg
online pharmacy australia cialis
certified canadian international pharmacy – order keflex 500mg for sale canada drugs online
wholesale viagra
motrin
stromectol
empire city casino online – online slots real money usa slot machine
ivermectin 2
over the counter viagra india
plaquenil eye exam
zithromax 1000mg generic – furosemide 40 mg pills zithromax 1000mg pill
buy azithromycin online uk
stromectol price – stromectol buy online ivermectin 12 mg over the counter
sildenafil 100mg discount
acyclovir 100
neurontin pfizer
buy modafinil online mexico
average cost of viagra 2018
cialis online purchase in india – cialis tadalafil tadalafil from india
can i buy generic cialis
generic name for ivermectin
strattera prescription uk
stromectol price – stromectol buy australia canadian drugs
best pills for ed – order prednisone without prescription buy accutane online nz
trazodone 159 mg
compare cialis prices online
viagra tablet purchase online
buy amitriptyline
cost of amoxicillin 875 mg
priligy 30mg cost – cheap priligy 30mg prednisolone 10mg usa
buy tadalafil pills
purchase provigil – stromectol tablets order stromectol for sale
over the counter viagra
order sildalis for sale – sildalis drug glucophage buy online
viagra prescription australia
buy hydroxychloroquine 200mg pill – plaquenil 400mg uk hydroxychloroquine price
sildenafil cheap buy
generique viagra 100mg – acheter 25mg sildenafil cialis 5mg generique pas cher
cialis online europe
cost of ivermectin pill – buy ed medication ivermectin without prescription
over the counter cialis canada
stromectol 3mg tablets
molnupiravir covid drug
flomax cost in india
accutane us – order amoxil sale amoxil 500mg over the counter
buy viagra from canada
cialis soft 20 mg
lisinopril 5mg pill – prilosec over the counter order prilosec 20mg
cheap arimidex online
buy pregabalin 150mg generic – buy clomiphene 100mg for sale brand zithromax 250mg
buy disulfiram canada
where can i buy arimidex online
aristocort 10mg brand – brand priligy 90mg clarinex buy online
discount generic tadalafil
generic cialis lowest price
cialis rx cost
cialis 20 mg buy online uk
stromectol 6 mg tablet
ivermectin 3mg tab
over the counter cialis usa
wellbutrin xl 300
sildenafil buy usa
cialis 200 mg price
viagra comparison prices
inderal 20mg price – trazodone 100mg pills buy hydroxychloroquine 400mg generic
buy hydroxychloroquine online – buy hydroxychloroquine 400mg sale purchase chloroquine
chloroquine ca – baricitinib without prescription buy viagra 100mg generic
tadalafil us – ivermectin cost in usa ivermectin drug