in Legal Scoops, Obama, Politics, Presidential Campaign, Trump Administration

Ex-FEC Commissioner: “Extremely Difficult” to Prove Trump Violated Finance Law

216 Comments

The liberal media has been mocking President Trump’s assertion that his involvement in the payouts to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal were in any way a violation of campaign finance law. On multiple occasions, Trump has noted that this was a “simple private transaction” unrelated to the campaign, and that if there was any criminal liability, it was on his lawyer, Michael Cohen. He has also argued that if there was any violation, it amounts to a civil case and not a criminal one.

Meanwhile, everyone who has been insisting that Trump is a Russian mole/Dictator/Nazi/Mobster is salivating at the prospect of the president going to prison for a long time.

But one former FEC commissioner says that’s very unlikely.

In an op-ed for Fox News, Hans von Spakovsky – who was on the Federal Elections Commission from 2006 to 2008 – said that prosecutors will find it challenging to prove that these payments were made to illegally influence the election.

“The blackmail threat by Daniels and McDougal to reveal their claims would exist whether or not Trump was running for office. He was a well-known celebrity, and celebrities face these claims all the time,” he said.

He pointed to the similar case of former Senator John Edwards, who was nearly prosecuted for using campaign funds to hush his mistress. Those charges were dropped because the feds could not prove that Edwards paid the woman to protect his political power rather than, as he claimed, simply keep the affair from his wife.

“Convicting Donald Trump of a criminal campaign finance violation will be extremely difficult, if not impossible,” he wrote. “Just as Edwards was found not guilty, the same is likely to happen to President Trump if he is charged while he is president or after he leaves the White House.”

Von Spakovsky noted that it will also be difficult for Democrats to turn this into an issue for impeachment purposes, reminding readers that Obama’s 2008 campaign was also in violation of campaign finance law.

“As for the claim the hush-money payments would be an impeachable offense, members of Congress would have to explain why prior cases in which campaigns like that of Barack Obama paid civil penalties to the Federal Election Commission for violations of federal campaign finance law were not grounds for impeachment,” he wrote.

Well, we’re sure they will explain it by saying: Yeah, but it’s Trump! And we hate Trump!

Have they ever needed any other reason? For any of this?

Written by Andrew

216 Comments

Leave a Reply

  153. I almost always close my medicament at Walgreens but they were exposed of the medication I needed, so I tried z pack azithromycin 250 mg. They had my medication, were remarkably brisk, palsy-walsy, worldly and much easier to deal with than Walgreens. My recipe was filled in less than 10 minutes, where Walgreens takes at the certainly least 1.5 hours. I was so impressed away the in the works they treated me that they will get my business from under on, no more Walgreens!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

“WALLS WORK”: Homeland Security Drops Some Fact Bombs About The Border

$25 Million: The Price Tag of the Mueller Witch Hunt So Far