in

Stanford Journalism Chief: Reporters Should Be “Advocates for Social Justice”

In an interview with The Stanford Daily this week, the man who has done more than perhaps anyone else to shape the university’s journalism program explicitly rejected the idea that reporters should bring “objectivity” to their work. Communications Professor Emeritus Ted Glasser told the student newspaper that journalists should actually peel away their objectivity if they want to do the job correctly.

“Journalists need to be overt and candid advocates for social justice, and it’s hard to do that under the constraints of objectivity,” he said.

The university watchdogs over at Campus Reform reached out to Glasser, who served for 14 years as the director of Stanford’s journalism graduate program. They asked him if he was serious about journalists leaving their objectivity at the door.

“My understanding of journalism, like my understanding of history, rests on the premise that there is no finally correct description of anything — only interpretations,” Glasser said. “I’m not a big fan of the term ‘objectivity’ or ‘objective truth’ because it gets us talking about all the wrong things. I like to view journalists as activists because journalism at its best — and indeed history at its best — is all about morality.”

Well, since there’s no such thing as “truth,” we assume that Glasser would be equally find with journalists whose idea of “morality” and “social justice” are miles away from his own. In other words, a conservative journalist pushing free market capitalism in all of his work would meet with Glasser’s unrestrained approval, right? A law-and-order minded journalist who constantly referred to “mostly peaceful protests” as the actual riots that they are? He should be thrilled with that, right?

Why do we get the feeling that’s not the case?

By the way, the end of this Campus Reform story contains some pretty hilarious unintentional comedy:

“I welcome the opportunity to respond to your inquiry but first we need to be sure we’re on the same page,” Glasser said when asked to comment. “I reject your claim that ‘journalism is a distinct field that is supposed to be based in objective truth.’ Indeed, I have no idea what you mean by ‘objective truth.’ Can you point to it?”

After Campus Reform defined the term as requested, Glasser said he was “surprised” by the response.

“No offense, but who cares what you think about what I said?” He later apologized, after being reminded of his request.

You’ll notice that whenever someone finds themselves in way over their head, buried under a sea of contradictions and obvious falsehoods, they tend to get hot under the collar really quickly. We imagine this guy is on a hair trigger at all times.

Written by Andrew

51 Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. Thank you for every other informative blog. The place else may just I get that kind of information written in such an ideal approach?
    I’ve a venture that I’m just now working on, and I have
    been on the glance out for such information.

  2. Do you mind if I quote a few of your posts as long as I provide credit and sources back to your blog?
    My blog site is in the very same niche as yours and my visitors
    would really benefit from some of the information you present here.
    Please let me know if this alright with you. Appreciate it!

  3. You actually make it appear so easy with your presentation however I in finding this topic
    to be really something that I feel I might by no means understand.
    It kind of feels too complex and very huge for me. I am having a look ahead for your subsequent submit, I will attempt to get the grasp
    of it!

  4. I have been exploring for a little for any high-quality articles or weblog posts
    on this kind of space . Exploring in Yahoo I at last stumbled
    upon this site. Studying this information So i’m satisfied to exhibit that
    I’ve a very excellent uncanny feeling I found out exactly what I needed.

    I most undoubtedly will make sure to don?t overlook this web site
    and give it a glance regularly.

  5. When I originally left a comment I seem to have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox
    and from now on every time a comment is added I get four emails with the exact
    same comment. Perhaps there is an easy method you are able to remove me
    from that service? Thanks a lot!

  6. Howdy I am so delighted I found your web site, I really found
    you by error, while I was searching on Bing for something else,
    Anyways I am here now and would just like to say cheers
    for a fantastic post and a all round interesting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to go through it
    all at the minute but I have bookmarked it and also included your RSS feeds,
    so when I have time I will be back to read a great deal
    more, Please do keep up the excellent b.

  7. I do consider all of the ideas you have introduced on your post.
    They are very convincing and will certainly work. Still, the posts are very quick for
    starters. May just you please extend them a bit from subsequent time?
    Thanks for the post.

  8. fantastic put up, very informative. I’m wondering why the other specialists of this sector don’t
    realize this. You must proceed your writing.

    I am sure, you’ve a great readers’ base already!

  9. I blog often and I truly appreciate your content.
    This great article has truly peaked my interest. I’m going to book
    mark your blog and keep checking for new information about once
    a week. I opted in for your Feed too.

  10. Howdy! This post could not be written any better! Reading through
    this post reminds me of my good old room mate! He always kept chatting about this.
    I will forward this write-up to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read.
    Many thanks for sharing!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

“A Collection of Liars”: Attorney General Barr Destroys the Leftist Media

View Co-Host: It’s Trump’s “False Narrative” That BLM Protests Are Violent